First of all, you should probably spend more time writing your paper than debating me. Time spent proof-reading would also do you some good. I make tons of typos, but not in anything that I submit professionally.

Also, you need to learn how to read critically. This post was NOT about school uniforms. It was about the selections of clothes that stores will stock. Here’s the sentence that you missed by not also reading the news article linked to:

“Midriff-baring shirts, low-rise pants, pajamas and slippers will all be off limits this fall for thousands of student in Modesto. So, what will students wear?”

Ms. Taylor’s conundrum is that she doesn’t shop at stores that provide clothing that would conform to the demands of the dress code. Ultimately, this is about supply and demand. If there is a demand, then there will be stores to supply that demand.

If that demand is for clothing that doesn’t show your abdomen, then there will be stores that will supply that demand.

What you evidently don’t like is my question about changing the emphasis at school back to education instead of clothing by considering the use of uniforms. That is an opinion, and you are welcome to your own opinion on the topic.

In this instance, a school system was trying to reign in excesses and kids were pouting about that. That only goes to show that the emphasis was on fashion, not education.

And we wonder why kids spell “situation” as “situatation”. Thanks for making my point for me.

–So please tell me what you have to say about that in the email that you should send back. That is if you have any good debates.–

With Concern,
Shelby