http://mickc.whizardries.com/archives/2005/03/24/hinzman-decision/ "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech." Fri, 25 Dec 2009 02:15:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://mickc.whizardries.com/archives/2005/03/24/hinzman-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-648 MickC Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:03:09 +0000 http://mickc.whizardries.com/archives/2005/03/24/hinzman-decision/#comment-648 That's the thing about the law, both north and south of the 49th: it depends on the meanings of words and phrases (like "conscienious objector"), something you dismiss as "verbal tricks." No matter how much Hinzman's supporters want the law to read differently than it does, a person may not be a selective objector. That’s the thing about the law, both north and south of the 49th: it depends on the meanings of words and phrases (like “conscienious objector”), something you dismiss as “verbal tricks.” No matter how much Hinzman’s supporters want the law to read differently than it does, a person may not be a selective objector.

]]> http://mickc.whizardries.com/archives/2005/03/24/hinzman-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-647 David Dodds Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:51:50 +0000 http://mickc.whizardries.com/archives/2005/03/24/hinzman-decision/#comment-647 Yopu can reason anything, the above is not. Using various verbal tricks ensures that this decsion was to be made and other arguements not listened to. Give me a break! Yopu can reason anything, the above is not. Using various verbal tricks ensures that this decsion was to be made and other arguements not listened to. Give me a break!

]]>